|
When people get upset, they
tend to feel the need for blame. That is normal to blame others rather than
themselves. However, some companies are feeling the effects of the blame.
Recently, Columbine High School victims’ parents sued the video game industry
for making violent games. In some past suits, some people sued the gun
companies for making guns, and the people won. I strongly disagree with
defendants of the lawsuits that had no involvement whatsoever with the
incident. It is like suing the car companies for causing all these car
accident. Games, guns, and cars are tools. They can be helpful or harmful
depending on how it is used. However, people seem to think that whoever
produces these tools are at fault.
The problem with
guns is that anybody can have one, thanks largely to the second amendment.
People in the 1790’s didn’t realize the effects of the second amendment that
it would have in the future. They felt the need to protect themselves from
British soldiers, and nobody would use guns to kill each other. Little did
they know that the consequences that it would have on the future. The gun
industry distributes it to a gun retail store and if the gun retail store
distributed a gun to a person who shouldn’t have a gun, then the store should
be the target of the suit rather than the companies.
Now the video
game industry faces its toughest critic. Video Games are becoming increasingly
violent. Some might say, “Why are there so many violent games?” Well, it is
what the people want. If everyone wanted games that didn’t have any violence,
then they wouldn’t make them. Now, the issue about video games is that violent
games make kids more violent. The video games don’t just ignore the young
people. They put ratings on the games, making it illegal to sell a Mature game
to an minor without an adult permission. Generally it is the adult’s
responsibility to monitor what the kids play or not. It is the same thing with
movies. They have ratings for a purpose of letting the parents know who are
the people being targeting to.
The car
industry has not faced a lawsuit, but let me explain why should a lawsuit be
dismissed if a lawsuit occurs. A drunk driver drives into a innocent
bystander, killing the driver and the bystander. Not feeling satisfied suing
the driver, they sue the car company. Now how does a car company be relate
into being a part of the blame? They were the weapon, but does a weapon fire
itself? Most of the times, it doesn’t however If that happens, then the suit
is justified
The companies
have been blamed for doing something that they didn’t do. Guns don’t kill
people. People kill people. The person is responsible. The companies should
say “Don’t blame us, blame yourselves, or the constitution.”
Hobbes Lionheart
This name originally opened a new email to Hobbes Lionheart at hobbes [at] finalfantasyfanatic.com. The mailto action is disabled in this restoration.
|